Current Events

Las Vegas Shooting: What Really Happened?

It was a Sunday night on October 1st, 2017 at 10:05pm that during a country music festival, Stephen Paddock opened fire from the 32nd floor of the Mandalay Bay Resort, killing 58 and injuring 489. His own death bringing the death count to 59.

This marks the deadliest mass shooting in United States history. Horribly tragic for all those lost, injured, and whose friends and family were harmed by the shooter. It is truly an evil act.

The motive is still a mystery even a week after the shooting. Law enforcement, the press, and common people alike are scrambling, attempting to find the truth about what happened that night. Some drawing their own conclusions based on their politics, while others wait for the evidence to come out. We already see many reactions and responses surfacing that are clearly painting an agenda, like with many Democrats, pundits, talk show hosts and RINO’s (Republicans In Name Only) rampaging for gun control and a neutering of the NRA (National Rifle Association).

22221622_136353453664717_8925554042073695422_n

Hillary Clinton herself seemingly blaming the NRA for the mass shooting, which is absolutely ridiculous as any sane person would acknowledge. Usually, when politicians and Democrats refer to the NRA as a problem, they don’t really mean the NRA, they’re talking about millions of law-abiding gun owners. Regardless, murder is illegal, thus violent criminals obviously don’t care about regulations on bump stocks.

22185032_10209811383832226_1218577931_n

There are many theories regarding the nature, evidence, and purpose of the shooting. The Islamic State has claimed that Stephen Paddock had converted to Islam and committed the awful act in their name. There does not seem to be any more evidence for this than ISIS’ statement itself, it’s there, but is not itself damning evidence of causality. Clark County Sheriff Joseph Lombardo has stated that Paddock had been living a secret life and has spent decades acquiring firearms, and has yet to determine whether he was being radicalized during this time. While it was previously reported that Paddock had ammonium nitrate, a chemical compound used in homemade bombs, in his parked car, it was also discovered that he had 50 pounds of Tannerite, another explosive chemical, the reason for this still remains unknown.

The number of legal firearms connected to Paddock was a total of 47. 12 of those weapons had bump stocks, and he purchased 33 of those between October of last year and the shooting.

In the interview with Stephen Paddock’s brother, Eric, he stated that Stephen was very intelligent, and was highly successful, a numbers guy, very analytical and an avid gambler. This explains why the shooting was so carefully planned and that Paddock even had a plan to escape, which investigations have recently uncovered.

Of course, there are plenty of convincing theories, unconvincing speculations, some made by assumption and others make a case that it was politically motivated or a false flag. Many people believe there is another shooter, or that Paddock is a ‘patsy’ for this horrific crime. There are some videos surfacing on social media that show other gunmen.

Interesting as these are, they are not added to the official story because of lack of attention or evidence. Although recently, Sheriff Joe Lombardo questions if Paddock did this all on his own, citing the amount of weapons, the mass of the explosive material and the planning itself. So even the Sheriff himself believes that there could be more to the story than just Stephen Paddock, a successful, gambler, pilot, intellectual, tempered man who could plan the deadliest mass shooting in U.S. History.

From what we know so far, and the recent questioning of Stephen Paddock’s girlfriend, Marilou Danley, a Filipino woman who has been a lifelong partner of Paddock’s. In her statement to investigators, she says that this is as surprising to her as it is to everyone else and that she had no idea. The fact that Paddock wired 100,000$ to Danley a week before the shooting is quite suspicious, but Marilou seems to have nothing to do with Paddock’s actions and the money was nothing more than a parting gift for her to go to the Philippines, whilst he went to Las Vegas. Lastly, there is the psychological side of things, Paddock was smart yet an ill-tempered man who was allergic to many things, even to where his girlfriend could not wear perfumes around him. Successful, yes, but seemingly erratic in his behavior. Paddock is also reported to have been prescribed ‘diazepam’, or better known by its brand name: Valium. It is a common medication used to treat anxiety, which Paddock seemed to have plenty of. It is speculated that Paddock was a “pill popping insane” gunman, or more noteworthy, that he experienced all the wrong side effects of the drug he was taking and that eventually led to his mental degradation.

Finally, all we can draw from this is putting the evidence and speculation aside, Stephen Paddock is emulating the psychotic attitude of his own father. Benjamin Hoskins Paddock, a bank robber and con man who managed to make it on the FBI’s Most Wanted List from 1969-1977 because of his escape from prison in 1968. Stephen’s mother, Dolores had four children with this man. What kind of a life do you think that led for Stephen and his siblings? We all know the plight of single motherhood on society, but who knows how horrendous this became. Eric Paddock, Stephen’s brother said himself that they were “bad kids” that it was “very tough on their mother” and sure, there are plenty of us who have made fine for ourselves despite our pasts and our upbringings, but one question perplexes us all, what happened to Stephen Paddock? Why did he do this? If he did it alone that is. Still many unanswered questions.

4 thoughts on “Las Vegas Shooting: What Really Happened?”

  1. Stop with the conspiracy bullshit of multiple shooters. Holy hell. When some random terrific thing happens, all the lunatics in town make sure to develop a new plot to it.

    Like

  2. There was a time when Americans believed in freedom.

    The US is dying from a million cuts. Part of the reason the USA is a nanny police state now is that whenever there is a problem, the kneejerk reaction in the US is to call for a new law.

    Nanny state laws are not the best solution, however. Nanny state laws lead to more laws, higher fines, and tougher sentences. Thirty-five years ago, DWI laws were enacted that led to DWI checkpoints and lower DWI levels. Seatbelt laws led to backseat seatbelt laws, childseat laws, and pet seatbelt laws. Car liability insurance laws led to health insurance laws and gun liability laws. Smoking laws that banned smoking in buildings led to laws against smoking in parks and then bans against smoking in entire cities. Sex offender registration laws led to sex offender restriction laws and violent offender registration laws.

    Nanny state laws don’t make us safer, either. Nanny state laws lead people to be careless since they don’t need to have personal responsibility anymore. People don’t need to be careful crossing the street now because drunk-driving has been outlawed and driving while using a mobile phone is illegal. People don’t investigate companies or carry out due diligence because businesses must have business licenses now.

    The main point of nanny state laws is not safety. The main purposes of more laws are control and revenue generation for the state.

    Another reason laws are enacted is because corporations give donations to lawmakers to stifle competition or increase sales.

    Many laws are contradictory, too. Some laws say watering lawns is required, while other laws say watering lawns is illegal.

    Many nanny state laws that aim to solve a problem can be fixed by using existing laws. If assault is already illegal, why do we need a new law that outlaws hitting umpires?

    Nanny state laws are not even necessary. If everything was legal would you steal, murder, and use crack cocaine? Aren’t there other ways to solve problems besides calling the police? Couldn’t people educate or talk to people who bother them? Couldn’t people be sued for annoying behavior? Couldn’t people just move away? Even if assault was legal, wouldn’t attackers risk being killed or injured, too? Do people have consciences? Having no laws doesn’t mean actions have no consequences.

    If there is no victim, there is no crime.

    We don’t need thousands of laws when we only need 10.

    Should swimming pools be banned because they are dangerous? Hammers? Bottles? Rocks? Energy drinks? Pillows?

    Where does it end?

    If one state can have self-serve gas stations, why can’t every state have them? If sodas were legal 20 years ago, why can’t they be legal now?

    Freedom is not just a one way street. You can only have freedom for yourself if you allow others to have it.

    Control freaks might get angry when a neighbor owns three indoor cats, but what did the neighbor take from them? Why should this be illegal? Is outlawing cats something a free country should do? Doesn’t banning everything sound like the opposite of liberty?

    Instead of getting mad at people who like freedom, why don’t people realize that freedom is a two way street?

    If you allow others to paint their house purple then you can, too.

    If you allow others to own a gun then you can, too.

    If you allow others to swear then you can, too.

    If you allow others to gamble then you can, too.

    Who wants to live in a prison?

    Think. Question everything.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s